標題: It would be difficult to perform merchandising analysis with this tool [打印本頁] 作者: darah16204 時間: 2024-3-5 17:33 標題: It would be difficult to perform merchandising analysis with this tool It doesn't report on revenue per channel or return on ad spend like other analytics tools do (don't expect to export tabular data, etc.). Multichannel analytics and attribution modeling are absent from this platform. Clicktale also doesn't have cohort or retention analysis reports. Information about product prices is also not posted on the website. From what I've heard, they're focused on "large enterprises" (i.e. customers with big revenue). Clicky Clicky is free to use (as long as you get fewer than 3,000 daily pageviews) and is a potential alternative to Google Analytics. Clicky has some unique features (real-time analytics, heatmaps, etc.), but I wouldn't say it's worth switching over from GA completely. Also, if you want to use heatmaps, there are a number of other free tools. Conductrics Conductrics is an advanced tool. By combining A/B testing and machine learning , it is possible to automatically provide the optimal experience for each user. It can be used as either a server-side or client-side tool. Customization is also a breeze. Here is Andrew Anderson 's review of this tool .
Pro: Very flexible in how you integrate with your current systems, from APIs to one-tag solutions. This tool is most effective when used as an active decision-making device, adapting to changing conditions and creating experiences around them, rather than simply using A/B testing. Unlike Belgium Phone Number Data other tools (Adobe Target Premium, 1:1, Touch Clarity, X+1, etc.), you can achieve these features even on small sites because you can select the elements you need instead of adding elements unnecessarily. be able to. The system is extremely robust, has low variability, and is fully functional. Although the help menu is a bit technical, the quality of support is high. Counterargument: More than other programs, knowledge is required to make decisions.
There is room for improvement in the report, especially in terms of visuals. A certain amount of learning is required to decipher the targeting report. It needs a lot of traffic to reach its full potential. Overall Thoughts: If you want to get serious about personalizing your adaptive learning and want flexibility in your interactions, Conductrics is the tool for you. It requires a lot of knowledge and learning compared to basic tools like Optimizely and VWO. But in the end, you'll probably get more functionality and flexibility than other tools. It's a better tool than standard tools. However, it is not suitable for companies of the size of Fortune 100.
