Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 8|回復: 0
打印 上一主題 下一主題

It would be difficult to perform merchandising analysis with this tool

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

0

好友

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

該用戶從未簽到

跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2024-3-5 17:33:34 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽
It doesn't report on revenue per channel or return on ad spend like other analytics tools do (don't expect to export tabular data, etc.). Multichannel analytics and attribution modeling are absent from this platform. Clicktale also doesn't have cohort or retention analysis reports. Information about product prices is also not posted on the website. From what I've heard, they're focused on "large enterprises" (i.e. customers with big revenue). Clicky Clicky is free to use (as long as you get fewer than 3,000 daily pageviews) and is a potential alternative to Google Analytics. Clicky has some unique features (real-time analytics, heatmaps, etc.), but I wouldn't say it's worth switching over from GA completely. Also, if you want to use heatmaps, there are a number of other free tools. Conductrics Conductrics is an advanced tool. By combining A/B testing and machine learning , it is possible to automatically provide the optimal experience for each user. It can be used as either a server-side or client-side tool. Customization is also a breeze. Here is Andrew Anderson 's review of this tool .

Pro: Very flexible in how you integrate with your current systems, from APIs to one-tag solutions. This tool is most effective when used as an active decision-making device, adapting to changing conditions and creating experiences around them, rather than simply using A/B testing. Unlike Belgium Phone Number Data other tools (Adobe Target Premium, 1:1, Touch Clarity, X+1, etc.), you can achieve these features even on small sites because you can select the elements you need instead of adding elements unnecessarily. be able to. The system is extremely robust, has low variability, and is fully functional. Although the help menu is a bit technical, the quality of support is high. Counterargument: More than other programs, knowledge is required to make decisions.



There is room for improvement in the report, especially in terms of visuals. A certain amount of learning is required to decipher the targeting report. It needs a lot of traffic to reach its full potential. Overall Thoughts: If you want to get serious about personalizing your adaptive learning and want flexibility in your interactions, Conductrics is the tool for you. It requires a lot of knowledge and learning compared to basic tools like Optimizely and VWO. But in the end, you'll probably get more functionality and flexibility than other tools. It's a better tool than standard tools. However, it is not suitable for companies of the size of Fortune 100.

回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

雲端vps主機|免費論壇|Archiver|手機版|Comsenz Inc.

GMT+8, 2024-12-26 01:02 , Processed in 0.061568 second(s), 22 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X2.5

© 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.

回頂部 一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |